On 7/8/2023 12:36 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Fri, 07 Jul 2023 16:23:59 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
Some subtests seem to be failing in CI, use igt_assert_(lt/eq) which
print the values being compared and some additional debug as well.

Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaum...@intel.com>
---
  tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c | 18 ++++++++----------
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
index 522abee35..cdb2e70ca 100644
--- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
+++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ static void test_freq_basic_api(int dirfd, int gt)
        rpn = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RPn_FREQ_MHZ);
        rp0 = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RP0_FREQ_MHZ);
        rpe = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RP1_FREQ_MHZ);
+       igt_debug("RPn: %d, RPe: %d, RP0: %d", rpn, rpe, rp0);
Print gt here too.
ok.

        /*
         * Negative bound tests
@@ -90,21 +91,18 @@ static void test_reset(int i915, int dirfd, int gt, int 
count)
        int fd;

        for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
-               igt_assert_f(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0,
-                            "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i);
-               igt_assert_f(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0,
-                            "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i);
+               igt_debug("Running cycle: %d", i);
+               igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
+               igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
                usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US);
-               igt_assert_f(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn,
-                            "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i);
+               igt_assert_eq(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ), rpn);

                /* Manually trigger a GT reset */
                fd = igt_debugfs_gt_open(i915, gt, "reset", O_WRONLY);
                igt_require(fd >= 0);
                igt_ignore_warn(write(fd, "1\n", 2));

-               igt_assert_f(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn,
-                            "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i);
+               igt_assert_eq(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ), rpn);
Probably ok but why the changes in this loop?

There are a couple of bugs that are failing around this area.

Thanks,

Vinay.


        }
        close(fd);
  }
@@ -116,13 +114,13 @@ static void test_suspend(int i915, int dirfd, int gt)
        igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
        igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
        usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US);
-       igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
+       igt_assert_eq(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ), rpn);

        /* Manually trigger a suspend */
        igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_S3,
                                      SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);

-       igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
+       igt_assert_eq(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ), rpn);
  }

  int i915 = -1;
--
2.38.1

Reply via email to