On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 01:02:54PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 25/07/2023 01:13, Matt Roper wrote:
> > Although some of our Xe_LPG workarounds were already being applied based
> > on IP version correctly, others were matching on MTL as a base platform,
> > which is incorrect.  Although MTL is the only platform right now that
> > uses Xe_LPG IP, this may not always be the case.  If a future platform
> > re-uses this graphics IP, the same workarounds should be applied, even
> > if it isn't a "MTL" platform.
> > 
> > We were also incorrectly applying Xe_LPG workarounds/tuning to the
> > Xe_LPM+ media IP in one or two places; we should make sure that we don't
> > try to apply graphics workarounds to the media GT and vice versa where
> > they don't belong.  A new helper macro IS_GT_IP_RANGE() is added to help
> > ensure this is handled properly -- it checks that the GT matches the IP
> > type being tested as well as the IP version falling in the proper range.
> > 
> > Note that many of the stepping-based workarounds are still incorrectly
> > checking for a MTL base platform; that will be remedied in a later
> > patch.
> > 
> > v2:
> >   - Rework macro into a slightly more generic IS_GT_IP_RANGE() that can
> >     be used for either GFX or MEDIA checks.
> > 
> > Cc: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.so...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.ro...@intel.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 38 +++++++++++----------
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h             | 23 +++++++++++++
> >   2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> > index d8a1eaa44e69..c4663541c5dd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> > @@ -805,8 +805,8 @@ static void dg2_ctx_workarounds_init(struct 
> > intel_engine_cs *engine,
> >     wa_masked_en(wal, CACHE_MODE_1, MSAA_OPTIMIZATION_REDUC_DISABLE);
> >   }
> > -static void mtl_ctx_gt_tuning_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> > -                              struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> > +static void xelpg_ctx_gt_tuning_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> > +                                struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> >   {
> >     struct drm_i915_private *i915 = engine->i915;
> > @@ -817,12 +817,12 @@ static void mtl_ctx_gt_tuning_init(struct 
> > intel_engine_cs *engine,
> >             wa_add(wal, DRAW_WATERMARK, VERT_WM_VAL, 0x3FF, 0, false);
> >   }
> > -static void mtl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> > -                                struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> > +static void xelpg_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> > +                                  struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> >   {
> >     struct drm_i915_private *i915 = engine->i915;
> > -   mtl_ctx_gt_tuning_init(engine, wal);
> > +   xelpg_ctx_gt_tuning_init(engine, wal);
> >     if (IS_MTL_GRAPHICS_STEP(i915, M, STEP_A0, STEP_B0) ||
> >         IS_MTL_GRAPHICS_STEP(i915, P, STEP_A0, STEP_B0)) {
> > @@ -931,8 +931,8 @@ __intel_engine_init_ctx_wa(struct intel_engine_cs 
> > *engine,
> >     if (engine->class != RENDER_CLASS)
> >             goto done;
> > -   if (IS_METEORLAKE(i915))
> > -           mtl_ctx_workarounds_init(engine, wal);
> > +   if (IS_GT_IP_RANGE(GFX, engine->gt, IP_VER(12, 70), IP_VER(12, 71)))
> > +           xelpg_ctx_workarounds_init(engine, wal);
> >     else if (IS_PONTEVECCHIO(i915))
> >             ; /* noop; none at this time */
> >     else if (IS_DG2(i915))
> > @@ -1790,10 +1790,8 @@ xelpmp_gt_workarounds_init(struct intel_gt *gt, 
> > struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> >    */
> >   static void gt_tuning_settings(struct intel_gt *gt, struct i915_wa_list 
> > *wal)
> >   {
> > -   if (IS_METEORLAKE(gt->i915)) {
> > -           if (gt->type != GT_MEDIA)
> > -                   wa_mcr_write_or(wal, XEHP_L3SCQREG7, 
> > BLEND_FILL_CACHING_OPT_DIS);
> > -
> > +   if (IS_GT_IP_RANGE(GFX, gt, IP_VER(12, 70), IP_VER(12, 71))) {
> > +           wa_mcr_write_or(wal, XEHP_L3SCQREG7, 
> > BLEND_FILL_CACHING_OPT_DIS);
> >             wa_mcr_write_or(wal, XEHP_SQCM, EN_32B_ACCESS);
> >     }
> > @@ -1825,7 +1823,7 @@ gt_init_workarounds(struct intel_gt *gt, struct 
> > i915_wa_list *wal)
> >             return;
> >     }
> > -   if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) >= IP_VER(12, 70))
> > +   if (IS_GT_IP_RANGE(GFX, gt, IP_VER(12, 70), IP_VER(12, 71)))
> >             xelpg_gt_workarounds_init(gt, wal);
> >     else if (IS_PONTEVECCHIO(i915))
> >             pvc_gt_workarounds_init(gt, wal);
> > @@ -2293,7 +2291,7 @@ static void pvc_whitelist_build(struct 
> > intel_engine_cs *engine)
> >     blacklist_trtt(engine);
> >   }
> > -static void mtl_whitelist_build(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > +static void xelpg_whitelist_build(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> >   {
> >     struct i915_wa_list *w = &engine->whitelist;
> > @@ -2315,8 +2313,10 @@ void intel_engine_init_whitelist(struct 
> > intel_engine_cs *engine)
> >     wa_init_start(w, engine->gt, "whitelist", engine->name);
> > -   if (IS_METEORLAKE(i915))
> > -           mtl_whitelist_build(engine);
> > +   if (engine->gt->type == GT_MEDIA)
> > +           ; /* none yet */
> > +   else if (IS_GT_IP_RANGE(GFX, engine->gt, IP_VER(12, 70), IP_VER(12, 
> > 71)))
> > +           xelpg_whitelist_build(engine);
> >     else if (IS_PONTEVECCHIO(i915))
> >             pvc_whitelist_build(engine);
> >     else if (IS_DG2(i915))
> > @@ -2974,10 +2974,12 @@ ccs_engine_wa_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, 
> > struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> >    * function invoked by __intel_engine_init_ctx_wa().
> >    */
> >   static void
> > -add_render_compute_tuning_settings(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > +add_render_compute_tuning_settings(struct intel_gt *gt,
> >                                struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> >   {
> > -   if (IS_METEORLAKE(i915) || IS_DG2(i915))
> > +   struct drm_i915_private *i915 = gt->i915;
> > +
> > +   if (IS_GT_IP_RANGE(GFX, gt, IP_VER(12, 70), IP_VER(12, 71)) || 
> > IS_DG2(i915))
> >             wa_mcr_write_clr_set(wal, RT_CTRL, STACKID_CTRL, 
> > STACKID_CTRL_512);
> >     /*
> > @@ -3007,7 +3009,7 @@ general_render_compute_wa_init(struct intel_engine_cs 
> > *engine, struct i915_wa_li
> >   {
> >     struct drm_i915_private *i915 = engine->i915;
> > -   add_render_compute_tuning_settings(i915, wal);
> > +   add_render_compute_tuning_settings(engine->gt, wal);
> >     if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 11) {
> >             /* This is not a Wa (although referred to as
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > index 682ef2b5c7d5..6bb825d40451 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > @@ -431,6 +431,29 @@ static inline struct intel_gt *to_gt(struct 
> > drm_i915_private *i915)
> >   #define IS_GRAPHICS_VER(i915, from, until) \
> >     (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= (from) && GRAPHICS_VER(i915) <= (until))
> > +#define __IS_MEDIA_GT(gt) ((gt)->type == GT_MEDIA)
> > +#define __IS_GFX_GT(gt) (!__IS_MEDIA_GT(gt))
> > +#define __GT_VER_FULL(gt) (__IS_MEDIA_GT(gt) ? \
> > +                      MEDIA_VER_FULL((gt)->i915) : \
> > +                      GRAPHICS_VER_FULL((gt)->i915))
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Check that a GT contains IP of the specified type and within the 
> > specified
> > + * IP range.  E.g.,
> > + *
> > + *    IS_GT_IP_RANGE(GFX, IP_VER(12, 70), IP_VER(12, 71))
> > + *    IS_GT_IP_RANGE(MEDIA, IP_VER(13, 00), IP_VER(18, 02))
> 
> I think without the magic GFX/MEDIA first argument would be better and more
> readable. That is simply IS_GT_IP_RANGE(gt, IP_VER(), IP_VER). GT type
> checks feel would be more readable on the outside, and some of them will
> even probably come from a level above. Even when split out on the same line
> it reads more readable to me, like:
> 
>   if (IS_MEDIA_GT(gt) && IS_GT_IP_RANGE(gt, IP_VER(), IP_VER())
> 

Hmm, that's the kind of logic I was kind of hoping we could eliminate
with this macro.  With hardware going forward, any IS_GT_IP_RANGE
without an associated GT check is going to be a bug so I was really
hoping to make it non-optional and ensure that there's always context
directly associated with the version numbers (since the numbers are
meaningless on their own without being tied to a specific IP type).
While keeping the check separate means you might be able to move the
type check to a higher layer of the code, it also means you're going to
be left with a bunch of stuff like

        if (IS_GT_IP_RANGE(gt, IP_VER(17, 0), IP_VER(18, 2)))

and it may not be as clear what IP(s) this is supposed to match on.


Matt

> Regards,
> 
> Tvrtko
> 
> > + *
> > + * Note that media version checks with this macro will only work on 
> > platforms
> > + * with standalone media design (i.e., media version 13 and higher).
> > + */
> > +#define IS_GT_IP_RANGE(type, gt, from, until) ( \
> > +   BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(from < IP_VER(2, 0)) + \
> > +   BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(until < from) + \
> > +   (__IS_##type##_GT(gt) && \
> > +    __GT_VER_FULL(gt) >= (from) && \
> > +    __GT_VER_FULL(gt) <= (until)))
> > +
> >   #define MEDIA_VER(i915)                   
> > (RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->media.ip.ver)
> >   #define MEDIA_VER_FULL(i915)              
> > IP_VER(RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->media.ip.ver, \
> >                                            RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->media.ip.rel)

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
Linux GPU Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation

Reply via email to