On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 01:58:30PM -0800, bradley.d.vol...@intel.com wrote: > From: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.vol...@intel.com> > > This is a speculative test in that it's not particularly relevant > today, but is important if we switch the parser implementation to > use kmap_atomic instead of vmap.
Do you not want to iterate over all (or some combination of) valid/invalid commands to better fuzz the handling of boundaries? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
