On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 01:57:28PM -0800, bradley.d.vol...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.vol...@intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.vol...@intel.com>
> ---
> include/drm/i915_drm.h | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/drm/i915_drm.h
> index 2f4eb8c..ba863c4 100644
> --- a/include/drm/i915_drm.h
> +++ b/include/drm/i915_drm.h
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
> #ifndef _I915_DRM_H_
> #define _I915_DRM_H_
>
> -#include <drm.h>
> +#include <drm/drm.h>
Something about this patch smells very fishy....
>
> /* Please note that modifications to all structs defined here are
> * subject to backwards-compatibility constraints.
> @@ -337,6 +337,7 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_irq_wait {
> #define I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_NO_RELOC 25
> #define I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_HANDLE_LUT 26
> #define I915_PARAM_HAS_WT 27
> +#define I915_PARAM_CMD_PARSER_VERSION 28
>
> typedef struct drm_i915_getparam {
> int param;
> @@ -721,7 +722,7 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 {
> */
> #define I915_EXEC_IS_PINNED (1<<10)
>
> -/** Provide a hint to the kernel that the command stream and auxilliary
> +/** Provide a hint to the kernel that the command stream and auxiliary
> * state buffers already holds the correct presumed addresses and so the
> * relocation process may be skipped if no buffers need to be moved in
> * preparation for the execbuffer.
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
