> This makes the code a bit more symmetric and readable, especially when we
> start adding more display version-specific alternatives.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coe...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 32 +++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> index de848b329f4b..43b8eeba26f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> @@ -311,23 +311,12 @@ static int mtl_tc_port_get_max_lane_count(struct
> intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> }
> }
>
> -int intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> +static int intel_tc_port_get_max_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port
> +*dig_port)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
> - struct intel_tc_port *tc = to_tc_port(dig_port);
> - enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(i915, dig_port->base.port);
> intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> - u32 lane_mask;
> -
> - if (!intel_phy_is_tc(i915, phy) || tc->mode != TC_PORT_DP_ALT)
> - return 4;
> + u32 lane_mask = 0;
>
> - assert_tc_cold_blocked(tc);
> -
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14)
> - return mtl_tc_port_get_max_lane_count(dig_port);
> -
> - lane_mask = 0;
> with_intel_display_power(i915, POWER_DOMAIN_DISPLAY_CORE,
> wakeref)
> lane_mask = intel_tc_port_get_lane_mask(dig_port);
>
> @@ -348,6 +337,23 @@ int intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count(struct
> intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> }
> }
>
> +int intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port
> +*dig_port) {
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
> + struct intel_tc_port *tc = to_tc_port(dig_port);
> + enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(i915, dig_port->base.port);
> +
> + if (!intel_phy_is_tc(i915, phy) || tc->mode != TC_PORT_DP_ALT)
> + return 4;
> +
> + assert_tc_cold_blocked(tc);
> +
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14)
> + return mtl_tc_port_get_max_lane_count(dig_port);
> +
> + return intel_tc_port_get_max_lane_count(dig_port);
> +}
Looking at this I think we have more scope of optimization here I think we can
go about it in the following way
intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count
already calls
with_intel_display_power(i915, POWER_DOMAIN_DISPLAY_CORE, wakeref)
lane_mask = intel_tc_port_get_lane_mask(dig_port);
which we also duplicate in mtl_tc_port_get_pin_assignment_mask
(now mtl_tc_port_get_max_lane_count) and the only difference between them
Is the switch case what if we have a function or repurpose
mtl_tc_port_get_max_lane_count to only have the switch case block with
assignment varied by display version and call it after
intel_tc_port_get_lane_mask
maybe also move the legacy switch case in its own function?
Regards,
Suraj Kandpal
> +
> void intel_tc_port_set_fia_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> int required_lanes)
> {
> --
> 2.39.2
