On 10/12/2023 06:45, Patchwork wrote:
Project List - Patchwork *Patch Details*
*Series:* drm/i915: Define and use GuC and CTB TLB invalidation
routines (rev2)
*URL:* https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/125002/
*State:* failure
*Details:*
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_125002v2/index.html
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13746 -> Patchwork_125002v2
Summary
*FAILURE*
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_125002v2 absolutely need
to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_125002v2, please notify your bug team
(lgci.bug.fil...@intel.com) to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives
in CI.
External URL:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_125002v2/index.html
Participating hosts (38 -> 38)
Additional (1): fi-bsw-n3050
Missing (1): fi-snb-2520m
Possible new issues
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
Patchwork_125002v2:
IGT changes
Possible regressions
*
igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_mocs:
o bat-mtlp-8: PASS
<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13746/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_mocs.html>
-> DMESG-WARN
<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_125002v2/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_mocs.html>
+1 other test dmesg-warn
*
igt@i915_selftest@live@guc:
o
bat-mtlp-6: PASS
<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13746/bat-mtlp-6/igt@i915_selftest@l...@guc.html>
-> DMESG-WARN
<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_125002v2/bat-mtlp-6/igt@i915_selftest@l...@guc.html>
+3 other tests dmesg-warn
o
bat-mtlp-8: NOTRUN -> DMESG-WARN
<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_125002v2/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@l...@guc.html>
+1 other test dmesg-warn
These failure all appear to be reset related. However, they are full GT
reset not individual engine resets. So not sure they can be explained by
the worker thread vs interrupt handler processing issue of the
gem_exec_capture failures.
I would definitely recommend running these locally when you have the
next version of the patch set ready.
John.
