Hi Alexander,
> +static int i915_spi_init_mtd(struct i915_spi *spi, struct device *device,
> + unsigned int nparts)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> + unsigned int n;
> + struct mtd_partition *parts = NULL;
> + int ret;
> +
> + dev_dbg(device, "registering with mtd\n");
> +
> + spi->mtd.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + spi->mtd.dev.parent = device;
> + spi->mtd.flags = MTD_CAP_NORFLASH | MTD_WRITEABLE;
> + spi->mtd.type = MTD_DATAFLASH;
> + spi->mtd.priv = spi;
> + spi->mtd._write = i915_spi_write;
> + spi->mtd._read = i915_spi_read;
> + spi->mtd._erase = i915_spi_erase;
> + spi->mtd._get_device = i915_spi_get_device;
> + spi->mtd._put_device = i915_spi_put_device;
> + spi->mtd.writesize = SZ_1; /* 1 byte granularity */
You say writesize should be aligned with 4 in your next patch?
> + spi->mtd.erasesize = SZ_4K; /* 4K bytes granularity */
> + spi->mtd.size = spi->size;
> +
> + parts = kcalloc(spi->nregions, sizeof(*parts), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!parts)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0, n = 0; i < spi->nregions && n < nparts; i++) {
> + if (!spi->regions[i].is_readable)
> + continue;
> + parts[n].name = spi->regions[i].name;
> + parts[n].offset = spi->regions[i].offset;
> + parts[n].size = spi->regions[i].size;
> + if (!spi->regions[i].is_writable)
> + parts[n].mask_flags = MTD_WRITEABLE;
> + n++;
> + }
> +
> + ret = mtd_device_register(&spi->mtd, parts, n);
> +
> + kfree(parts);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
Thanks,
Miquèl
