On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 09:55:15AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 10:21:09AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > The xfarray code will crash if large folios are force enabled using: > > > > echo force > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/shmem_enabled > > > > Fixing this will require a bit of an API change, and prefeably sorting out > > the hwpoison story for pages vs folio and where it is placed in the shmem > > API. For now use this one liner to disable large folios. > > > > Reported-by: Darrick J. Wong <djw...@kernel.org> > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> > > Can someone who knows more about shmem.c than I do please review > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20240103084126.513354-4-...@lst.de/ > so that I can feel slightly more confident as hch and I sort through the > xfile.c issues? > > For this patch, > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djw...@kernel.org>
...except that I'm still getting 2M THPs even with this enabled, so I guess either we get to fix it now, or create our own private tmpfs mount so that we can pass in huge=never, similar to what i915 does. :( --D > --D > > > --- > > fs/xfs/scrub/xfile.c | 5 +++++ > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/xfile.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/xfile.c > > index 090c3ead43fdf1..1a8d1bedd0b0dc 100644 > > --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/xfile.c > > +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/xfile.c > > @@ -94,6 +94,11 @@ xfile_create( > > > > lockdep_set_class(&inode->i_rwsem, &xfile_i_mutex_key); > > > > + /* > > + * We're not quite ready for large folios yet. > > + */ > > + mapping_clear_large_folios(inode->i_mapping); > > + > > trace_xfile_create(xf); > > > > *xfilep = xf; > > -- > > 2.39.2 > > > > >
