We currently call intel_mark_idle() too often, as we do so as a
side-effect of processing the request queue. However, we the calls to
intel_mark_idle() are expected to be paired with a call to
intel_mark_busy() (or else we try to idle the hardware by accessing
registers that are already disabled). Make the idle/busy tracking
explicit to prevent the multiple calls.
Reported-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 8 ++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 4 +---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 11 +++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 2 +-
4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 00222cc..8441c8a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1134,6 +1134,14 @@ struct i915_gem_mm {
*/
bool interruptible;
+ /**
+ * Is the GPU currently considered idle, or busy executing userspace
+ * requests? Whilst idle, we attempt to power down the hardware and
+ * display clocks. In order to reduce the effect on performance, there
+ * is a slight delay before we do so.
+ */
+ bool busy;
+
/** Bit 6 swizzling required for X tiling */
uint32_t bit_6_swizzle_x;
/** Bit 6 swizzling required for Y tiling */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 9a40ef5..4525dd7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2315,7 +2315,6 @@ int __i915_add_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
i915_gem_context_reference(request->ctx);
request->emitted_jiffies = jiffies;
- was_empty = list_empty(&ring->request_list);
list_add_tail(&request->list, &ring->request_list);
request->file_priv = NULL;
@@ -2336,12 +2335,11 @@ int __i915_add_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
if (!dev_priv->ums.mm_suspended) {
i915_queue_hangcheck(ring->dev);
- if (was_empty) {
+ if (intel_mark_busy(dev_priv->dev)) {
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev_priv->mm.idle_work);
queue_delayed_work(dev_priv->wq,
&dev_priv->mm.retire_work,
round_jiffies_up_relative(HZ));
- intel_mark_busy(dev_priv->dev);
}
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index e127b23..bfd6396 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -8220,8 +8220,14 @@ void intel_mark_busy(struct drm_device *dev)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+ if (dev_priv->mm.busy)
+ return false;
+
hsw_package_c8_gpu_busy(dev_priv);
i915_update_gfx_val(dev_priv);
+ dev_priv->mm.busy = true;
+
+ return true;
}
void intel_mark_idle(struct drm_device *dev)
@@ -8229,6 +8235,11 @@ void intel_mark_idle(struct drm_device *dev)
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
struct drm_crtc *crtc;
+ if (!dev_priv->mm.busy)
+ return;
+
+ dev_priv->mm.busy = false;
+
hsw_package_c8_gpu_idle(dev_priv);
if (!i915.powersave)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index e5e1a5c..4c329e0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ void intel_ddi_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
const char *intel_output_name(int output);
bool intel_has_pending_fb_unpin(struct drm_device *dev);
int intel_pch_rawclk(struct drm_device *dev);
-void intel_mark_busy(struct drm_device *dev);
+bool intel_mark_busy(struct drm_device *dev);
void intel_mark_fb_busy(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
struct intel_ring_buffer *ring);
void intel_mark_idle(struct drm_device *dev);
--
1.7.9.5
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
