On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 10:34:26AM +0200, Jouni Högander wrote:
> IO buffer wake time used for IO wake calculation is dependent on port clock
> on LunarLake and beyond. Take this into account in get_io_buffer_wake_time.
>
> Bspec: 65450
>
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogan...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index e1df0ece9fa3..e8410e770da8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -1160,6 +1160,9 @@ static bool _lnl_compute_alpm_params(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
> * This is not directly mentioned in Bspec. There are 50 us io wake time and
> 32
> * us fast wake time. Clearly preharge pulses are not (improperly) included
> in
> * 32 us fast wake time. 50 us - 32 us = 18 us.
> + *
> + * For DISPLAY_VER >= 20
> + * RBR 15us, HBR1 11us, higher rates 10us
> */
> static int get_io_buffer_wake_time(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> @@ -1167,8 +1170,12 @@ static int get_io_buffer_wake_time(const struct
> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>
> if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 12)
> return 18;
> - else
> + else if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 20 || crtc_state->port_clock > 270000)
> return 10;
> + else if (crtc_state->port_clock > 162000)
> + return 11;
> + else
> + return 15;
That's getting rather messy. I think having separate functions for
skl vs. tgl vs. mtl (assuming the ver==20 is mtl) would be cleaner.
And the only one of those that I think deserves a comment is skl since
there we don't get a proper value from bspec directly.
> }
>
> static bool _compute_alpm_params(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> --
> 2.34.1
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
