On 08/03/2024 17:03, Jani Nikula wrote:
None of the callers of drm_panel_get_modes() expect it to return
negative error codes. Either they propagate the return value in their
struct drm_connector_helper_funcs .get_modes() hook (which is also not
supposed to return negative codes), or add it to other counts leading to
bogus values.

On the other hand, many of the struct drm_panel_funcs .get_modes() hooks
do return negative error codes, so handle them gracefully instead of
propagating further.

Return 0 for no modes, whatever the reason.

Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstr...@linaro.org>
Cc: Jessica Zhang <quic_jessz...@quicinc.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <s...@ravnborg.org>
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c | 17 +++++++++++------
  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c
index e814020bbcd3..cfbe020de54e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c
@@ -274,19 +274,24 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_panel_disable);
   * The modes probed from the panel are automatically added to the connector
   * that the panel is attached to.
   *
- * Return: The number of modes available from the panel on success or a
- * negative error code on failure.
+ * Return: The number of modes available from the panel on success, or 0 on
+ * failure (no modes).
   */
  int drm_panel_get_modes(struct drm_panel *panel,
                        struct drm_connector *connector)
  {
        if (!panel)
-               return -EINVAL;
+               return 0;
- if (panel->funcs && panel->funcs->get_modes)
-               return panel->funcs->get_modes(panel, connector);
+       if (panel->funcs && panel->funcs->get_modes) {
+               int num;
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+               num = panel->funcs->get_modes(panel, connector);
+               if (num > 0)
+                       return num;
+       }
+
+       return 0;
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_panel_get_modes);

Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstr...@linaro.org>

Reply via email to