On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 07:44:21PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> At the moment, we allow force joiner debugs to work only for connector
> with status connected and a crtc attached to it.
> This creates a problem when we force bigjoiner and then pipe gets reset
> before the force bigjoiner is disabled.
> Relax the condition to check for crtc while exposing the debugfs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nauti...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c | 8 ++------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> index b99c024b0934..94bc9e0d30fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> @@ -1405,10 +1405,8 @@ out:   
> drm_modeset_unlock(&i915->drm.mode_config.connection_mutex);
>  static int i915_bigjoiner_enable_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  {
>       struct intel_connector *connector = m->private;
> -     struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>  
> -     crtc = connector->base.state->crtc;
> -     if (connector->base.status != connector_status_connected || !crtc)
> +     if (connector->base.status != connector_status_connected)

Just remove all of it. It serves no purpose.

>               return -ENODEV;
>  
>       seq_printf(m, "Bigjoiner enable: %d\n", 
> connector->force_bigjoiner_enable);
> @@ -1443,12 +1441,10 @@ static ssize_t i915_bigjoiner_enable_write(struct 
> file *file,
>  {
>       struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
>       struct intel_connector *connector = m->private;
> -     struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>       bool bigjoiner_en = 0;
>       int ret;
>  
> -     crtc = connector->base.state->crtc;
> -     if (connector->base.status != connector_status_connected || !crtc)
> +     if (connector->base.status != connector_status_connected)
>               return -ENODEV;
>  
>       ret = kstrtobool_from_user(ubuf, len, &bigjoiner_en);
> -- 
> 2.40.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

Reply via email to