> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Ville
> Syrjala
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2024 6:43 AM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [PATCH 18/22] drm/i915: Handle joined pipes inside hsw_crtc_disable()
>
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>
> Reorganize the crtc disable path to only deal with the master
> pipes/transcoders
> in intel_old_crtc_state_disables() and offload the handling of joined pipes to
> hsw_crtc_disable().
> This makes the whole thing much more sensible since we can actually control
> the order in which we do the per-pipe vs.
> per-transcoder modeset steps.
>
> v2: Use the name 'pipe_crtc' for the per-pipe crtc pointer
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 64 ++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 58ee40786d5c..c15ea046c62a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -1791,29 +1791,28 @@ static void hsw_crtc_disable(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state,
> const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state =
> intel_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> + struct intel_crtc *pipe_crtc;
>
> /*
> * FIXME collapse everything to one hook.
> * Need care with mst->ddi interactions.
> */
> - if (!intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(old_crtc_state)) {
> - intel_encoders_disable(state, crtc);
> - intel_encoders_post_disable(state, crtc);
> - }
> -
> - intel_disable_shared_dpll(old_crtc_state);
> + intel_encoders_disable(state, crtc);
> + intel_encoders_post_disable(state, crtc);
>
> - if (!intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(old_crtc_state)) {
> - struct intel_crtc *slave_crtc;
> + for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(&i915->drm, pipe_crtc,
> +
> intel_crtc_joined_pipe_mask(old_crtc_state)) {
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *old_pipe_crtc_state =
> + intel_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(state, pipe_crtc);
>
> - intel_encoders_post_pll_disable(state, crtc);
> + intel_disable_shared_dpll(old_pipe_crtc_state);
> + }
As per the sequence is considered, should the pll be disabled prior to
disabling the encoders and then followed by post_pll_disable?
Thanks and Regards,
Arun R Murthy
--------------------
