On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 01:28:48 -0700, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi Andi,
> > @@ -839,16 +837,38 @@ void i915_hwmon_register(struct drm_i915_private > > *i915) > > if (!hwm_gt_is_visible(ddat_gt, hwmon_energy, > > hwmon_energy_input, 0)) > > continue; > > > > - hwmon_dev = devm_hwmon_device_register_with_info(dev, > > ddat_gt->name, > > - ddat_gt, > > - > > &hwm_gt_chip_info, > > - NULL); > > - if (!IS_ERR(hwmon_dev)) > > - ddat_gt->hwmon_dev = hwmon_dev; > > + hwmon_dev = hwmon_device_register_with_info(dev, ddat_gt->name, > > + ddat_gt, > > + &hwm_gt_chip_info, > > + NULL); > > + if (IS_ERR(hwmon_dev)) > > + goto err; > > here the logic is changing, though. Before we were not leaving if > hwmon_device_register_with_info() was returning error. > > Is this wanted? And why isn't it described in the log? Not sure if the previous logic was intentional or not, anyway I have restored it in v5 (where I once again forgot to add "PATCH v5" to the Subject but v5 is there in the version log :/). Thanks. -- Ashutosh
