On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 11:36:14AM +0530, deepa...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Deepak S <deepa...@intel.com>
>
> We are adding a module paramter to control rps boost. By default, we
> enable the boost for better performace. Based on the need (perf/power)
> we can either enable/disable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepa...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c | 8 ++++++++
> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 2baeeef..398b101 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1963,6 +1963,7 @@ struct i915_params {
> int panel_use_ssc;
> int vbt_sdvo_panel_type;
> int enable_rc6;
> + int enable_rps_boost;
> int enable_fbc;
> bool enable_hangcheck;
> int enable_ppgtt;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index a8a069f..1478ea6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -990,6 +990,17 @@ static bool can_wait_boost(struct drm_i915_file_private
> *file_priv)
> return !atomic_xchg(&file_priv->rps_wait_boost, true);
> }
>
> +static int intel_enable_rps_boost(struct drm_device *dev)
> +{
> + /* No RPS Boost before Ironlake */
> + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 6)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* Respect the kernel parameter if it is set */
> + return i915.enable_rps_boost;
> +
> +}
This function isn't needed since it's never called for gen<6. Also the
comment doesn't match the code anyway.
> +
> /**
> * __wait_seqno - wait until execution of seqno has finished
> * @ring: the ring expected to report seqno
> @@ -1030,7 +1041,9 @@ static int __wait_seqno(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
> u32 seqno,
> timeout_expire = timeout ? jiffies +
> timespec_to_jiffies_timeout(timeout) : 0;
>
> if (dev_priv->info->gen >= 6 && can_wait_boost(file_priv)) {
> - gen6_rps_boost(dev_priv);
> + if (intel_enable_rps_boost(ring->dev))
> + gen6_rps_boost(dev_priv);
> +
if (dev_priv->info->gen >= 6 &&
i915.enable_rps.boost && can_wait_boost(file_priv)) {
This seems like a better way since there's no point in scheduling the
idle_work if there was no boosting in the first place.
> if (file_priv)
> mod_delayed_work(dev_priv->wq,
> &file_priv->mm.idle_work,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> index c743057..a19bd7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct i915_params i915 __read_mostly = {
> .prefault_disable = 0,
> .reset = true,
> .invert_brightness = 0,
> + .enable_rps_boost = 1,
> };
>
> module_param_named(modeset, i915.modeset, int, 0400);
> @@ -153,3 +154,10 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(invert_brightness,
> "report PCI device ID, subsystem vendor and subsystem device ID "
> "to dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org, if your machine needs it. "
> "It will then be included in an upcoming module version.");
> +
> +module_param_named(enable_rps_boost, i915.enable_rps_boost, int, 0600);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable_rps_boost,
> + "Enable/Disable boost RPS frequency (default: true)");
> +
> +
> +
> --
> 1.8.5.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
