> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2024 1:31 AM
> To: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Borah, Chaitanya Kumar <chaitanya.kumar.bo...@intel.com>;
> peili....@gmail.com; Nikula, Jani <jani.nik...@intel.com>; Saarinen, Jani
> <jani.saari...@intel.com>; Kurmi, Suresh Kumar
> <suresh.kumar.ku...@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-
> m...@kvack.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Regression on linux-next (next-20240712)
>
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 13:00:58 +0200 David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> > > Could you please check why the patch causes this regression and provide
> a fix if necessary?
> >
> > This is know.
> >
> > There is a discussion along the original patch [1] on how to do it
> > differently. But likely we'll tackle it differently [2]. So this patch
> > should be dropped for -- which I think already happened because I
> > cannot spot that patch in mm-unstable anymore.
>
> Yes, I dropped it on July 15.
Thank you. Our CI runs seems to have recovered from the regression.
Regards
Chaitanya
