Re: [linux-next:master] [fs] d91ea8195e: stress-ng.ring-pipe.ops_per_sec -5.1% regression (stress-ng.ring-pipe.pipe_read+write_calls_per_sec 7.3% improvement)

[Eric Biggers]

On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:19:25AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> kernel test robot noticed a -5.1% regression of 
> stress-ng.ring-pipe.ops_per_sec

These emails that talk about negative regressions keep confusing me.  A negative
regression would be an improvement.  But that is not actually what is meant.

Wondering if the wording can be fixed to remove the minus sign.

- Eric