On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 05:51:01PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> Let's try this again. I've pushed a branch here:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~bwidawsk/drm-intel/log/?h=bdw-backports
> 
> I need to re-review some of the merge conflicts for 4g GGTT, which I
> will try to do before Monday.
> 
> Daniel: please make sure this is what you had in mind. I don't know
> where you want Cc: stable tags.

We don't need cc: stable, we just need to submit it (since it has the
upstream sha1s already, which is the requirement for stable patches). Cc:
stable is only for when you want it to get backport anyway. Otherwise
looks good. I dunno whether git cherry-pick can be told to use the sha1
reference layout Greg prefers or not, he uses "This is <sha1> in
upstream." between the commit header and the actual commit message. But
ime his scripts reformat your commit messages anyway.

> James: please test this as soon as possible.

Once this is tested and we conclude it's sufficient to get bdw going on
3.14 without hilarity I think we should do a quick review on intel-gfx to
check that the impact outside of bdw is indeed minimal. Then once drm-next
has landed with all the referenced commits we can submit it to Greg with a
small cover letter why we want this and that plan B would be to kill bdw
in 3.14.

Thanks for doing this,
Daniel

> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 11:48:09AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > The following patches are the backported "simple" fixes for 3.14. Some
> > of these already had Cc: stable on them, but required conflict
> > resolution which I've provided (presumably they canbe dropped if it's
> > easier for upstream). There will be another series of backports which
> > has fixes that require more than a single patch.
> > 
> > I will not have a machine to test these on until Monday, but I am
> > mailing them out now in case our QA can get it tested sooner.
> > 
> > Ben Widawsky (2):
> >   drm/i915/bdw: Use scratch page table for GEN8 PPGTT
> >   drm/i915/bdw: Restore PPAT on thaw
> > 
> > Damien Lespiau (1):
> >   drm/i915/bdw: The TLB invalidation mechanism has been removed from
> >     INSTPM
> > 
> > Jani Nikula (1):
> >   drm/i915: don't flood the logs about bdw semaphores
> > 
> > Kenneth Graunke (2):
> >   drm/i915: Add a partial instruction shootdown workaround on Broadwell.
> >   drm/i915: Add thread stall DOP clock gating workaround on Broadwell.
> > 
> > Mika Kuoppala (2):
> >   drm/i915: Fix forcewake counts for gen8
> >   drm/i915: Do forcewake reset on gen8
> > 
> > Ville Syrjälä (4):
> >   drm/i915: Disable semaphore wait event idle message on BDW
> >   drm/i915: Implement WaDisableSDEUnitClockGating:bdw
> >   drm/i915: We implement WaDisableAsyncFlipPerfMode:bdw
> >   drm/i915: Don't clobber CHICKEN_PIPESL_1 on BDW
> > 
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c         |  5 ++++-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c     |  7 +++++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h         | 10 ++++++++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c         | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 12 +++++++++---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c     | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
> >  6 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > 
> > -- 
> > 1.9.1
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> -- 
> Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to