On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:19:19PM +0530, sourab.gu...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Akash Goel <akash.g...@intel.com>
> 
> Added a new rendering specific Workaround 'WaTlbInvalidateStoreDataBefore'.
> In this WA, before pipecontrol with TLB invalidate set, need to add 2 MI
> Store data commands.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Akash Goel <akash.g...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sourab Gupta <sourab.gu...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index 87d1a2d..2812384 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -2207,6 +2207,28 @@ intel_ring_invalidate_all_caches(struct 
> intel_ring_buffer *ring)
>       uint32_t flush_domains;
>       int ret;
>  
> +     if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(ring->dev)) {
The ring flushes are vfuncs, so why is this here and not in a special
vlv ring flush?

> +             /*
> +              * WaTlbInvalidateStoreDataBefore:vlv
> +              * Before pipecontrol with TLB invalidate set, need 2 store
> +              * data commands (such as MI_STORE_DATA_IMM or 
> MI_STORE_DATA_INDEX)
> +              * Without this, hardware cannot guarantee the command after the
> +              * PIPE_CONTROL with TLB inv will not use the old TLB values.

Crumbs, it sounds like our i-g-t are not sensitive enough. This bug
crops up in many disguises over the years, do you have any suggestion on
how we can improve our tests?

> +              */
> +             int i;
> +             ret = intel_ring_begin(ring, 4 * 2);

This can be we written to use 6 dwords.

> +             if (ret)
> +                     return ret;
> +             for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> +                     intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX);
> +                     intel_ring_emit(ring, I915_GEM_HWS_SCRATCH_INDEX <<
> +                                             MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX_SHIFT);

This is I915_GEM_HWS_SCRATCH_ADDR

> +                     intel_ring_emit(ring, 0);
> +                     intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_NOOP);
> +             }
> +             intel_ring_advance(ring);
> +     }
> +
>       flush_domains = 0;
>       if (ring->gpu_caches_dirty)
>               flush_domains = I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS;

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to