Hi Mikolaj,
> > + if (!ppgtt->vm.allocate_va_range) {
> > + i915_vm_put(&ppgtt->vm);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
>
> I don't know if it feels more in line with kernel style, but consider
> changing it to a label before second `i915_vm_put` at end of function
> plus goto instead of creating new cleanup section.
I do not mind, we can place a label as well, as long as we avoid
using that uninitialized struct. I will include your suggestion
in v3.
> Otherwise looks alright.
> Reviewed-by: Mikolaj Wasiak <[email protected]>
Thanks for reviewing!
Krzysztof
