On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net> wrote:
> I don't think it's quite that easy, but I took it as a, "yes." Which one
> is patch 3?

"drm/i915: make semaphore signaller detection more robust" - it was a
follow-up patch in this thread, hence no 3/3. If the relevant bits on
bdw have moved out of the the cmd dword I guess we need to keep a
cache of the relevant dword and supply it to the function. Was too
lazy to check that though.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to