On Friday 28 March 2014 06:36 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 02:53:48PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:05:01PM +0530, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
@@ -1403,6 +1411,13 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_private {
/* gen6+ rps state */
struct intel_gen6_power_mgmt rps;
+ /* rps wa up ei calculation */
+ struct intel_rps_ei_calc rps_up_ei;
+
+ /* rps wa down ei calculation */
+ struct intel_rps_ei_calc rps_down_ei;
I could have sworn there was a field for holding all the interesting rps
state together.
-Chris
Hi Chris,
Earlier i was using the rps structure to hold the wa rps state, but there was
not of duplicated code to avoid that i created a separate structure.
We can still re-factor and use rps structure to hold the wa state. Let me know
if we need to created a separate patch to re-factor or add to the WA patch
itself.
I a thinking of adding a new patch on top this.
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
