On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 01:51:30PM +0530, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Deepak S <deepa...@intel.com>
>
> Let's change the i915_cur_delayinfo to i915_cur_freqinfo to be in sync
> with new RPS naming convention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepa...@intel.com>
If we're doing a rename, we might as well do a rename. The function does
plenty more than "cur"
my vote:
i915_frequency_info
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 049dcb5..3cfc35c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -966,7 +966,7 @@ static int i915_rstdby_delays(struct seq_file *m, void
> *unused)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int i915_cur_delayinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> +static int i915_cur_freqinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> {
> struct drm_info_node *node = (struct drm_info_node *) m->private;
> struct drm_device *dev = node->minor->dev;
> @@ -3772,7 +3772,7 @@ static const struct drm_info_list i915_debugfs_list[] =
> {
> {"i915_gem_hws_bsd", i915_hws_info, 0, (void *)VCS},
> {"i915_gem_hws_vebox", i915_hws_info, 0, (void *)VECS},
> {"i915_rstdby_delays", i915_rstdby_delays, 0},
> - {"i915_cur_delayinfo", i915_cur_delayinfo, 0},
> + {"i915_cur_freqinfo", i915_cur_freqinfo, 0},
> {"i915_delayfreq_table", i915_delayfreq_table, 0},
> {"i915_inttoext_table", i915_inttoext_table, 0},
> {"i915_drpc_info", i915_drpc_info, 0},
> --
> 1.8.5.2
>
--
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
