On Fri, 04 Jul 2025, Sakari Ailus <[email protected]> wrote: > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend(), > pm_runtime_autosuspend() and pm_request_autosuspend() now include a call > to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). Remove the now-reduntant explicit call to > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <[email protected]> > --- > The cover letter of the set can be found here > <URL:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/[email protected]>. > > In brief, this patch depends on PM runtime patches adding marking the last > busy timestamp in autosuspend related functions. The patches are here, on > rc2: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git \ > pm-runtime-6.17-rc1
I would think it's better to wait for linux-pm to get merged to Linus' tree and then backmerged to drm after -rc1 instead of cross-merging that directly to drm. Regardless, for merging the i915 changes via whichever tree, Acked-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> -- Jani Nikula, Intel
