On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:21:44AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > I am not convinced this is the correct solution. At least the way we > used this interface, it isn't meant to ever fail. I also didn't look > into exactly why we depend an ENOSPC return. That sounds fragile to me, > especially for a public interface.
Eh? This interface is explicitly used to check that the requested range is available. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
