On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 07:57:47PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> Since the state capture happens from a deferred work, we may drop the
> last power domain/RPM reference since the error got triggered (from an
> interrupt handler for example). I hit this by writing to the i915_wedged
> debugfs file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
This looks fishy - as long as the gpu is busy we should keep a runtime pm
ref around. Also same comment as before, grabbing a display power domain
for this seems wrong.
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index b8f64d7..a586c16 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -2174,6 +2174,8 @@ static void i915_error_work_func(struct work_struct
> *work)
> kobject_uevent_env(&dev->primary->kdev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE,
> reset_event);
>
> + intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_INIT);
> +
> /*
> * All state reset _must_ be completed before we update the
> * reset counter, for otherwise waiters might miss the reset
> @@ -2184,6 +2186,8 @@ static void i915_error_work_func(struct work_struct
> *work)
>
> intel_display_handle_reset(dev);
>
> + intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_INIT);
> +
> if (ret == 0) {
> /*
> * After all the gem state is reset, increment the reset
> --
> 1.8.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
