On Wednesday 09 April 2014 06:36 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:28:28PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
+static void gen8_enable_rps_interrupts(struct drm_device *dev)
+{
+       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+
+       /* Clear out any stale interrupts first */
+       spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
+       WARN_ON(dev_priv->rps.pm_iir);
+       I915_WRITE(GEN8_GT_IIR(2), I915_READ(GEN8_GT_IIR(2)));
+       dev_priv->pm_irq_mask &= ~GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS;
+       I915_WRITE(GEN8_GT_IMR(2), dev_priv->pm_irq_mask);
+       spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
+
+       I915_WRITE(GEN8_GT_IER(2), GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS);
+       /* only unmask PM interrupts we need. Mask all others. */
+       I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK, ~GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS);
PMINTRMSK handling is now a part of set_rps (and so this line is
redundant).
-Chris

Thanks Chris. I will make the changes based on the current nightly code


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to