From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>

Some systems (eg. LNL Lenovo Thinkapd X1 Carbon) declare
semi-bogus non-monotonic WM latency values:
 WM0 latency not provided
 WM1 latency 100 usec
 WM2 latency 100 usec
 WM3 latency 100 usec
 WM4 latency 93 usec
 WM5 latency 100 usec

Apparently Windows just papers over the issue by bumping the
latencies for the higher watermark levels to make them monotonic
again. Do the same.

Cc: Luca Coelho <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
index d83772c6ea9a..2a40c135cb96 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
@@ -3236,6 +3236,19 @@ static void sanitize_wm_latency(struct intel_display 
*display)
                wm[level] = 0;
 }
 
+static void make_wm_latency_monotonic(struct intel_display *display)
+{
+       u16 *wm = display->wm.skl_latency;
+       int level, num_levels = display->wm.num_levels;
+
+       for (level = 1; level < num_levels; level++) {
+               if (wm[level] == 0)
+                       break;
+
+               wm[level] = max(wm[level], wm[level-1]);
+       }
+}
+
 static void
 adjust_wm_latency(struct intel_display *display)
 {
@@ -3246,6 +3259,8 @@ adjust_wm_latency(struct intel_display *display)
 
        sanitize_wm_latency(display);
 
+       make_wm_latency_monotonic(display);
+
        /*
         * WaWmMemoryReadLatency
         *
-- 
2.49.1

Reply via email to