On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 04:59:51PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Oct 2025, Ville Syrjala <[email protected]> wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> >
> > intel_frontbuffer_get() is what locks out subsequent set_tiling
> > changes to the bo. Thus the fence vs. modifier check must be done
> > after intel_frontbuffer_get(), or else a concurrent set_tiling ioctl
> > might sneak in and change the fence after the check has been done.
> >
> > Close the race again. See commit dd689287b977 ("drm/i915: Prevent
> > concurrent tiling/framebuffer modifications") for the previous
> > instance.
> >
> > Cc: Jouni Högander <[email protected]>
> > Fixes: 10690b8a49bc ("drm/i915/display: Add intel_fb_bo_framebuffer_fini")
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c | 38 +++++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c
> > index 69237dabdae8..c5bbca7f2e8b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c
> > @@ -2218,15 +2218,17 @@ int intel_framebuffer_init(struct intel_framebuffer 
> > *intel_fb,
> >     int ret = -EINVAL;
> >     int i;
> >  
> > -   ret = intel_fb_bo_framebuffer_init(fb, obj, mode_cmd);
> > -   if (ret)
> > -           return ret;
> > -
> > +   /*
> > +    * intel_frontbuffer_get() must be done before
> > +    * intel_fb_bo_framebuffer_init() to avoid set_tiling vs. addfb race.
> > +    */
> >     intel_fb->frontbuffer = intel_frontbuffer_get(obj);
> > -   if (!intel_fb->frontbuffer) {
> > -           ret = -ENOMEM;
> > -           goto err;
> > -   }
> > +   if (!intel_fb->frontbuffer)
> > +           return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +   ret = intel_fb_bo_framebuffer_init(fb, obj, mode_cmd);
> > +   if (ret)
> > +           goto err_frontbuffer_put;
> 
> Do you think we should modify intel_user_framebuffer_destroy() to also
> have the same put & fini order here, just for consistency?

Sounds reasonable. I'll send a v2.

> 
> I think this should be merged before my leak fix, and that should be
> rebased [1], to make the backports easier.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> 
> >  
> >     ret = -EINVAL;
> >     if (!drm_any_plane_has_format(display->drm,
> > @@ -2235,7 +2237,7 @@ int intel_framebuffer_init(struct intel_framebuffer 
> > *intel_fb,
> >             drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
> >                         "unsupported pixel format %p4cc / modifier 
> > 0x%llx\n",
> >                         &mode_cmd->pixel_format, mode_cmd->modifier[0]);
> > -           goto err_frontbuffer_put;
> > +           goto err_bo_framebuffer_fini;
> >     }
> >  
> >     max_stride = intel_fb_max_stride(display, mode_cmd->pixel_format,
> > @@ -2246,7 +2248,7 @@ int intel_framebuffer_init(struct intel_framebuffer 
> > *intel_fb,
> >                         mode_cmd->modifier[0] != DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR ?
> >                         "tiled" : "linear",
> >                         mode_cmd->pitches[0], max_stride);
> > -           goto err_frontbuffer_put;
> > +           goto err_bo_framebuffer_fini;
> >     }
> >  
> >     /* FIXME need to adjust LINOFF/TILEOFF accordingly. */
> > @@ -2254,7 +2256,7 @@ int intel_framebuffer_init(struct intel_framebuffer 
> > *intel_fb,
> >             drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
> >                         "plane 0 offset (0x%08x) must be 0\n",
> >                         mode_cmd->offsets[0]);
> > -           goto err_frontbuffer_put;
> > +           goto err_bo_framebuffer_fini;
> >     }
> >  
> >     drm_helper_mode_fill_fb_struct(display->drm, fb, info, mode_cmd);
> > @@ -2264,7 +2266,7 @@ int intel_framebuffer_init(struct intel_framebuffer 
> > *intel_fb,
> >  
> >             if (mode_cmd->handles[i] != mode_cmd->handles[0]) {
> >                     drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "bad plane %d handle\n", i);
> > -                   goto err_frontbuffer_put;
> > +                   goto err_bo_framebuffer_fini;
> >             }
> >  
> >             stride_alignment = intel_fb_stride_alignment(fb, i);
> > @@ -2272,7 +2274,7 @@ int intel_framebuffer_init(struct intel_framebuffer 
> > *intel_fb,
> >                     drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
> >                                 "plane %d pitch (%d) must be at least %u 
> > byte aligned\n",
> >                                 i, fb->pitches[i], stride_alignment);
> > -                   goto err_frontbuffer_put;
> > +                   goto err_bo_framebuffer_fini;
> >             }
> >  
> >             if (intel_fb_is_gen12_ccs_aux_plane(fb, i)) {
> > @@ -2282,7 +2284,7 @@ int intel_framebuffer_init(struct intel_framebuffer 
> > *intel_fb,
> >                             drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
> >                                         "ccs aux plane %d pitch (%d) must 
> > be %d\n",
> >                                         i, fb->pitches[i], ccs_aux_stride);
> > -                           goto err_frontbuffer_put;
> > +                           goto err_bo_framebuffer_fini;
> >                     }
> >             }
> >  
> > @@ -2291,7 +2293,7 @@ int intel_framebuffer_init(struct intel_framebuffer 
> > *intel_fb,
> >  
> >     ret = intel_fill_fb_info(display, intel_fb);
> >     if (ret)
> > -           goto err_frontbuffer_put;
> > +           goto err_bo_framebuffer_fini;
> >  
> >     if (intel_fb_uses_dpt(fb)) {
> >             struct i915_address_space *vm;
> > @@ -2317,10 +2319,10 @@ int intel_framebuffer_init(struct intel_framebuffer 
> > *intel_fb,
> >  err_free_dpt:
> >     if (intel_fb_uses_dpt(fb))
> >             intel_dpt_destroy(intel_fb->dpt_vm);
> > -err_frontbuffer_put:
> > -   intel_frontbuffer_put(intel_fb->frontbuffer);
> > -err:
> > +err_bo_framebuffer_fini:
> >     intel_fb_bo_framebuffer_fini(obj);
> > +err_frontbuffer_put:
> > +   intel_frontbuffer_put(intel_fb->frontbuffer);
> >     return ret;
> >  }
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

Reply via email to