Hi, https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/155622/ i915.CI.FULL - Re-reported.
Thanks, Ravali. -----Original Message----- From: I915-ci-infra <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Janusz Krzysztofik Sent: 09 October 2025 19:14 To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for drm/i915: Avoid lock inversion when pinning to GGTT Hi [email protected], On Thursday, 9 October 2025 10:02:58 CEST Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: drm/i915: Avoid lock inversion when pinning to GGTT > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/155622/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_17327_full -> Patchwork_155622v1_full > ==================================================== > > Summary > ------- > > **FAILURE** > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_155622v1_full absolutely need > to be > verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_155622v1_full, please notify your bug team > ([email protected]) to allow them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > > > Participating hosts (11 -> 11) > ------------------------------ > > No changes in participating hosts > > Possible new issues > ------------------- > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > Patchwork_155622v1_full: > > ### IGT changes ### > > #### Possible regressions #### > > * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-reset: > - shard-dg1: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] +1 other test fail > [1]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_17327/shard-dg1-18/igt@[email protected] > [2]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_155622v1/shard-dg1- > 14/igt@[email protected] > > * igt@i915_pm_rpm@system-suspend-execbuf: > - shard-mtlp: [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] > [3]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_17327/shard-mtlp-3/igt@[email protected] > [4]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_155622v1/shard-mtlp > -2/igt@[email protected] The change in scope modifies behavior of the i915 only when running on CherryView, or on Broxton with VT-D enabled. None of those platforms are exercised in shards runs, then none of potential regressions from those runs can be related. Please update filters and re-report. Thanks, Janusz > ...
