Hi, https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/155622/ i915.CI.FULL - Re-reported.
Thanks, Ravali. -----Original Message----- From: I915-ci-infra <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Janusz Krzysztofik Sent: 24 October 2025 13:56 To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for drm/i915: Avoid lock inversion when pinning to GGTT (rev3) Hi [email protected], On Friday, 24 October 2025 06:34:28 CEST Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: drm/i915: Avoid lock inversion when pinning to GGTT (rev3) > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/155622/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_17414_full -> Patchwork_155622v3_full > ==================================================== > > Summary > ------- > > **FAILURE** > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_155622v3_full absolutely need > to be > verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_155622v3_full, please notify your bug team > ([email protected]) to allow them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > > > Participating hosts (11 -> 11) > ------------------------------ > > No changes in participating hosts > > Possible new issues > ------------------- > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > Patchwork_155622v3_full: > > ### IGT changes ### > > #### Possible regressions #### > > * igt@kms_setmode@basic: > - shard-rkl: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] > [1]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_17414/shard-rkl-5/igt@[email protected] > [2]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_155622v3/shard-rkl- > 2/igt@[email protected] > > * igt@kms_setmode@basic@pipe-a-hdmi-a-1: > - shard-rkl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][3] +1 other test fail > [3]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_155622v3/shard-rkl- > 2/igt@kms_setmode@[email protected] Changes tested in this pre-merge run can only affect CHV and BXT platforms, then the above potential regressions are not related. Please update filters and re-report. Thanks, Janusz > > > Known issues > ------------ ...
