pengdonglin <[email protected]> writes: > From: pengdonglin <[email protected]> > > Since commit a8bb74acd8efe ("rcu: Consolidate RCU-sched update-side function > definitions") > there is no difference between rcu_read_lock(), rcu_read_lock_bh() and > rcu_read_lock_sched() in terms of RCU read section and the relevant grace > period. That means that spin_lock(), which implies rcu_read_lock_sched(), > also implies rcu_read_lock(). > > There is no need no explicitly start a RCU read section if one has already > been started implicitly by spin_lock(). > > Simplify the code and remove the inner rcu_read_lock() invocation. > > Cc: "Toke" <[email protected]> > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]>
