On Mon, 01 Dec 2025, Luca Coelho <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-12-01 at 14:25 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Mon, 01 Dec 2025, Luca Coelho <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2025-11-25 at 15:24 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display_rpm.c 
>> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display_rpm.c
>> > > index 340f65884812..9416ec784e39 100644
>> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display_rpm.c
>> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display_rpm.c
>> > > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>> > >  
>> > >  #include "intel_display_core.h"
>> > >  #include "intel_display_rpm.h"
>> > > +#include "intel_wakeref.h"
>> > 
>> > Just to be sure this is not a stray change, why did you add it here?
>> 
>> I was pretty sure it was required, maybe depending on some kconfig,
>> because the include is being removed in some other places, but I can't
>> reproduce the fail now.
>> 
>> I'd say not a huge problem because it's being removed in the next patch
>> no matter what.
>
> Makes sense.  Thanks for the clarification. :)

Thanks for the review, pushed the series to din.

BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

Reply via email to