> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nikula, Jani <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2026 5:16 PM
> To: Shankar, Uma <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; Shankar, Uma <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [v2 05/19] drm/{i915, xe}: Extract pcode definitions to common
> header
>
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2026, Uma Shankar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > There are certain register definitions which are commonly shared by
> > i915, xe and display. Extract the same to a common header to avoid
> > duplication.
> >
> > Move GEN6_PCODE_MAILBOX to common header to make intel_cdclk.c free
> > from including i915_reg.h
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 101 +------------------
> > include/drm/intel/intel_gmd_common_regs.h | 108
> > +++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-) create mode
> > 100644 include/drm/intel/intel_gmd_common_regs.h
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > index 9bfbfbf34dc0..531db1b452d1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > @@ -27,9 +27,9 @@
> >
> > #include <drm/drm_fixed.h>
> > #include <drm/drm_print.h>
> > +#include <drm/intel/intel_gmd_common_regs.h>
> >
> > #include "hsw_ips.h"
> > -#include "i915_reg.h"
> > #include "intel_atomic.h"
> > #include "intel_audio.h"
> > #include "intel_cdclk.h"
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index dc13f9eb4cd7..35122c997b8a
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> > #ifndef _I915_REG_H_
> > #define _I915_REG_H_
> >
> > +#include <drm/intel/intel_gmd_common_regs.h>
>
> Oh, I also dislike this, because it becomes unclear what needs them. The
> benefit
> from more granular headers is that only the places that need them can include
> them, and we can actually quickly check what includes what instead of these
> indirect dependencies.
Noted, will fix it.
Regards,
Uma Shankar
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel
