On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 06:26:11PM +0530, Vignesh Raman wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > On 27/01/26 18:01, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 04:14:01PM +0530, Vignesh Raman wrote: > > > Recent IGT [1] seems to be broken on MSM hardware, with many tests > > > failing due to the old_primary->index != 0 assertion. Uprev IGT to > > > the last known good revision where the tests pass, and update the > > > expectation files accordingly. > > > > > > [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools/-/commit/a909ab05 > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raman <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]> > > > > It is not clear, which parts here are due to Mesa uprev (yes, there are > > some of those) and which are due to the IGT uprev. Please split into two > > commits and make sure that Mesa-uprev passes more or less clearly. > > The mesa uprev and the IGT uprev are already split into two separate > commits. The IGT uprev only updates the IGT version in gitlab-ci.yml and > xfails.
I think I was not clear enough: Mesa uprev also causes some of the xfails. Those needs to be a part of the Mesa uprev commit. -- With best wishes Dmitry
