On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 01:13:21PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 08 May 2014, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> > +static void snb_wm_latency_quirk(struct drm_device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > + bool changed;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The BIOS provided WM memory latency values are often
> > + * inadequate for high resolution displays. Adjust them.
> > + */
> > + changed = ilk_increase_wm_latency(dev_priv, dev_priv->wm.pri_latency,
> > 12) |
> > + ilk_increase_wm_latency(dev_priv, dev_priv->wm.spr_latency, 12)
> > |
> > + ilk_increase_wm_latency(dev_priv, dev_priv->wm.cur_latency, 12);
>
> Nitpick, s/|/||/g for bools.
Consider side effects.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
