On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 01:16:43PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> There may be a dependency here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org>
Hm, this implicit ordering is a bit funky imo ... If this increase in
complexity in furture platforms I think we should switch to epxlicit
depencies and grab references in turn. Turtles all the way down and all.
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index e8f0c85..fb7e23e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -6122,12 +6122,6 @@ static struct i915_power_well vlv_power_wells[] = {
> .ops = &vlv_display_power_well_ops,
> },
> {
> - .name = "dpio-common",
> - .domains = VLV_DPIO_CMN_BC_POWER_DOMAINS,
> - .data = PUNIT_POWER_WELL_DPIO_CMN_BC,
> - .ops = &vlv_dpio_power_well_ops,
> - },
> - {
> .name = "dpio-tx-b-01",
> .domains = VLV_DPIO_TX_B_LANES_01_POWER_DOMAINS |
> VLV_DPIO_TX_B_LANES_23_POWER_DOMAINS |
> @@ -6163,6 +6157,12 @@ static struct i915_power_well vlv_power_wells[] = {
> .ops = &vlv_dpio_power_well_ops,
> .data = PUNIT_POWER_WELL_DPIO_TX_C_LANES_23,
> },
> + {
> + .name = "dpio-common",
> + .domains = VLV_DPIO_CMN_BC_POWER_DOMAINS,
> + .data = PUNIT_POWER_WELL_DPIO_CMN_BC,
> + .ops = &vlv_dpio_power_well_ops,
> + },
> };
>
> #define set_power_wells(power_domains, __power_wells) ({ \
> --
> 1.8.4.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
