On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 07:24:02PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > So we have a change to see something on the screen, while still being > relatively short (~1s per sub-test). > > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lesp...@intel.com>
igt_wait_for_keypress is geared at such use-cases ... Maybe we should have a default timeout in case you don't actually want to run it interactively. -Daniel > --- > tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c b/tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c > index b48921b..c4abdf7 100644 > --- a/tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c > +++ b/tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c > @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static void test_bad_command(data_t *data, const char > *cmd) > fclose(ctl); > } > > -#define N_CRCS 3 > +#define N_CRCS 60 > > #define TEST_SEQUENCE (1<<0) > > -- > 1.8.3.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
