On 11.06.2014 11:10, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Tue, 6 May 2014 22:25:04 +0300
Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janul...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
From: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janul...@linux.intel.com>
This is a re-spin of my resource streamer patchset from October
adapted to enable the feature on Broadwell instead.
The resource streamer is a hw-feature that helps in reducing commands
being submitted by the CPU. Haswell initially has this feature.
Unfortunately, HSW seems to have problems switching between non-RS
and RS-enabled commands[1]. On BDW however it works seamlessly
as expected.
The i-g-t test comes next on a separate patch-series.
--
[1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2014-May/044577.html
Abdiel Janulgue (2):
drm/i915/bdw: Enable resource streamer bits on MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START
drm/i915/bdw: Expose I915_EXEC_RESOURCE_STREAMER flag
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 8 ++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 3 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 1 +
include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h | 7 ++++++-
5 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
These seem trivial enough... have you seen cases where you'd like to
enable it in Mesa? If so, it probably makes sense to merge this patch
so you can do your tuning and enabling on the Mesa side...
I've had some Mesa patches since last year. Unfortunately, the changes
didn't
give any dramatic performance improvements. On the other hand, I admit:
1. I've
only run it against GLBenchmark and Unigine benchmarks. Discussion with
Portland
folks seem to suggest that we need to have a comprehensive run with more
benchmarks. 2. I only did the benchmarks in Haswell. Would be nice to see
how it does on Broadwell.
I agree though that further tuning of the performance needs to be done on
the Mesa side.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
