Make the assumption that media workloads are not as latency sensitive
for __wait_seqno, and that upclocking the GPU does not affect the BLT
engine. Under that assumption, we only wait to forcibly upclock the GPU
when we are stalling for results from the render pipeline.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 5951618a6b08..242b595a0403 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -1409,7 +1409,7 @@ static int __wait_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, u32 
seqno,
 
        timeout_expire = timeout ? jiffies + 
timespec_to_jiffies_timeout(timeout) : 0;
 
-       if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6 && can_wait_boost(file_priv)) {
+       if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6 && ring->id == RCS && 
can_wait_boost(file_priv)) {
                gen6_rps_boost(dev_priv);
                if (file_priv)
                        mod_delayed_work(dev_priv->wq,
-- 
2.0.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to