On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 01:39:29AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > semaphore _sync_seqno, _seqno and _mbox are smaller than number of rings. > This optimization is to remove the ring itself from the list and the logic to > do that > is at intel_ring_sync_index as below: > > /* > * rcs -> 0 = vcs, 1 = bcs, 2 = vecs, 3 = vcs2; > * vcs -> 0 = bcs, 1 = vecs, 2 = vcs2, 3 = rcs; > * bcs -> 0 = vecs, 1 = vcs2. 2 = rcs, 3 = vcs; > * vecs -> 0 = vcs2, 1 = rcs, 2 = vcs, 3 = bcs; > * vcs2 -> 0 = rcs, 1 = vcs, 2 = bcs, 3 = vecs; > */ > > v2: Skip when from == to (Damien). > > Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lesp...@intel.com> > Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widaw...@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 12 ++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c > index 9faebbc..6608bee 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c > @@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ static void gen8_record_semaphore_state(struct > drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > struct intel_engine_cs *ring, > struct drm_i915_error_ring *ering) > { > - struct intel_engine_cs *useless; > + struct intel_engine_cs *to; > int i; > > if (!i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev_priv->dev)) > @@ -776,13 +776,17 @@ static void gen8_record_semaphore_state(struct > drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > dev_priv->semaphore_obj, > &dev_priv->gtt.base); > > - for_each_ring(useless, dev_priv, i) { > + for_each_ring(to, dev_priv, i) { > u16 signal_offset = > (GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(ring, i) & PAGE_MASK) / 4; > u32 *tmp = error->semaphore_obj->pages[0]; > + int idx = intel_ring_sync_index(ring, to); > > - ering->semaphore_mboxes[i] = tmp[signal_offset]; > - ering->semaphore_seqno[i] = ring->semaphore.sync_seqno[i]; > + if (ring->id == to->id) > + return;
continue; ? you need to skip "ring", but you also need to fill the array when to->id > ring->id. I guess you should also be able to short-circuit the iteration sooner as well, no need to do the computations. I believe if "(ring == to)" would work as well. -- Damien _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx