From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Now that drm_update_vblank_count() can be called even when we're not
about to enable the vblank interrupts we shouldn't print debug messages
stating otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
index e927e5f..87abca3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void drm_update_vblank_count(struct drm_device *dev,
int crtc)
crtc, vblank->last, cur_vblank, diff);
}
- DRM_DEBUG("enabling vblank interrupts on crtc %d, missed %d\n",
+ DRM_DEBUG("updating vblank count on crtc %d, missed %d\n",
crtc, diff);
if (diff == 0)
--
1.8.5.5
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
