From: Oscar Mateo <oscar.ma...@intel.com>
This is mostly for correctness so that we know we are running the LR
context correctly (this is, the PDPs are contained inside the context
object).
v2: Move the check to inside the enable PPGTT function. The switch
happens in two places: the legacy context switch (that we won't hit
when Execlists are enabled) and the PPGTT enable, which unfortunately
we need. This would look much nicer if the ppgtt->enable was part of
the ring init, where it logically belongs.
v3: Move the check to the start of the enable PPGTT function. None
of the legacy PPGTT enabling is required when using LRCs as the
PPGTT is enabled in the context descriptor and the PDPs are written
in the LRC.
v4: Clarify comment based on review feedback.
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.ma...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Daniel <thomas.dan...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
index 5188936..2966b53 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
@@ -843,6 +843,12 @@ static int gen8_ppgtt_enable(struct i915_hw_ppgtt *ppgtt)
struct intel_engine_cs *ring;
int j, ret;
+ /* In the case of execlists, PPGTT is enabled by the context descriptor
+ * and the PDPs are contained within the context itself. We don't
+ * need to do anything here. */
+ if (i915.enable_execlists)
+ return 0;
+
for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, j) {
I915_WRITE(RING_MODE_GEN7(ring),
_MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(GFX_PPGTT_ENABLE));
--
1.7.9.5
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
