On Thursday 18 September 2014 06:38 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 01:53:13PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:39:25AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 06:51:50PM +0530, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Deepak S <deepa...@linux.intel.com>

Based on the HW team inputs. We can should not wait for the old ack,
Waiting for old ack might fail, when other forcewake came before the
present one is desserted.

for example, if forcewake bit 0 was set and before it could get cleared
forcewake bit 1 got set, HW eventually clear bit 0, when the bit 1
is cleared. i.e, bit 1 is still sent then forcewake bit 0 will still be
set.

Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepa...@linux.intel.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 10 ----------
  1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index 918b761..bcb0806 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -196,11 +196,6 @@ static void __vlv_force_wake_get(struct drm_i915_private 
*dev_priv,
  {
        /* Check for Render Engine */
        if (FORCEWAKE_RENDER & fw_engine) {
-               if (wait_for_atomic((__raw_i915_read32(dev_priv,
-                                               FORCEWAKE_ACK_VLV) &
-                                               FORCEWAKE_KERNEL) == 0,
-                                       FORCEWAKE_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS))
-                       DRM_ERROR("Timed out: Render forcewake old ack to 
clear.\n");
Can we have a comment here? Something like this perhaps:

/*
  * WaRsDontPollForAckOnClearingFWBits:vlv
  * Hardware clears ack bits lazily (only when all ack
  * bits become 0) so don't poll for individiual ack
  * bits to be clear here.
  */

Apart from that:
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Shouldn't this be Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org?
Perhaps. But on the other hand LRI to display registers is busted on
VLV so the ddx doesn't do scanline waits which means it doesn't
poke at the forcewake bits either. So only the KERNEL bit gets poked
and so it should be quite impossible to encounter this issue with
current userspace. Which probably explains why no one has ever
reported it, or at least I don't remember seeing such a report
myself.

-Daniel

Your right, with current userspace we should not see the issue. But if user 
space starts using other forcewake bits,
we might endup hanging the system due to wait for OLD Ack. Advice from HW team 
was to avoid this check.

Thanks
Deepak

                __raw_i915_write32(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_VLV,
                                   _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(FORCEWAKE_KERNEL));
@@ -214,11 +209,6 @@ static void __vlv_force_wake_get(struct drm_i915_private 
*dev_priv,
/* Check for Media Engine */
        if (FORCEWAKE_MEDIA & fw_engine) {
-               if (wait_for_atomic((__raw_i915_read32(dev_priv,
-                                               FORCEWAKE_ACK_MEDIA_VLV) &
-                                               FORCEWAKE_KERNEL) == 0,
-                                       FORCEWAKE_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS))
-                       DRM_ERROR("Timed out: Media forcewake old ack to 
clear.\n");
__raw_i915_write32(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_MEDIA_VLV,
                                   _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(FORCEWAKE_KERNEL));
--
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to