> -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 10:50 AM > To: Gore, Tim > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Disable Android low memory killer > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:27:22AM +0100, tim.g...@intel.com wrote: > > From: Tim Gore <tim.g...@intel.com> > > > > For some tests that put pressure on memory, the Android > > lowmemorykiller needs to be disabled for the test to run to > > completion. The first patch is a simple bit of preparation to ensure > > that all (well written) "simple" tests exit via a call to igt_exit, in > > the same way as tests with subtests do. > > This is to make sure we can clean up by re-enabling the > > lowmemorykiller. > > The second patch is to disable the Android lowmemorykiller during the > > common initialisation code (in oom_adjust_for_doom to be exact) and to > > re-enstate it in igt_exit. > > Isn't this just a huge red flag that the kernel is incompatible with our UMA > allocation strategy and that by masking the issue we will never be motivated > to fix it? > -Chris > I don't think so. This is really just about the Android low memory killer having Different goals to kswapd. Kswapd tries to keep a certain amount of free memory so that the kernel can run smoothly. On Android the lowmemorykiller attempts to maintain somewhat higher levels of free memory by killing off processes, because the user is not expected to ever close anything and expects new applications to open quickly. So if you put the memory under pressure the Android low memory killer will inevitably look for something to kill, and if your test is the only thing running its toast. The linux oom killer is still there, but is never needed on Android because the lowmemorykiller gets there first.
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
