On Saturday 08 November 2014 01:03 AM, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>Even with the rps debug messages signficantly recuced by commit 67956867aa07c59d6d83628bbc9ee4bd9799a1e1 Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue Sep 2 15:12:17 2014 +0300 drm/i915: Don't spam dmesg with rps messages on vlv/chv we still get an inordinate amount of spam from this. Just kill the debug print. If someone wants to observe it they can just use the tracepoint. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c index 300d7e5..9285dee 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c @@ -4504,14 +4504,8 @@ void valleyview_set_rps(struct drm_device *dev, u8 val) "Odd GPU freq value\n")) val &= ~1;- if (val != dev_priv->rps.cur_freq) {- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("GPU freq request from %d MHz (%u) to %d MHz (%u)\n", - vlv_gpu_freq(dev_priv, dev_priv->rps.cur_freq), - dev_priv->rps.cur_freq, - vlv_gpu_freq(dev_priv, val), val); - + if (val != dev_priv->rps.cur_freq) vlv_punit_write(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_GPU_FREQ_REQ, val); - }I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK, gen6_rps_pm_mask(dev_priv, val));
:) - Reviewed-by: Deepak S<deepa...@linux.intel.com> _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
