On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:04:09PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 03:48:27PM +0000, Arun Siluvery wrote:
> > We are not freeing memory allocated for ringbuf and ctx if we fail
> > to map status page so release all resources correctly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluv...@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 6 ++++--
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > index f3efdbd..a84d24b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > @@ -1777,8 +1777,10 @@ int intel_lr_context_deferred_create(struct
> > intel_context *ctx,
> > ring->status_page.gfx_addr = i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(ctx_obj);
> > ring->status_page.page_addr =
> > kmap(sg_page(ctx_obj->pages->sgl));
> > - if (ring->status_page.page_addr == NULL)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > + if (ring->status_page.page_addr == NULL) {
> > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto error;
> > + }
>
> Since this popped up: Do we have an automated igt testcase to exercise
> this corner-case?
How? kmap() never returns NULL.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
