From: John Harrison <john.c.harri...@intel.com>
Added the request structure's 'uniq' identifier to the trace information. Also
renamed the '_complete' trace event to '_notify' as it actually happens in the
IRQ 'notify_ring()' function. Additionally there is now a new '_complete' trace
event which occurs when a request structure is marked as complete.
v2: New patch added to series.
For: VIZ-4377
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <john.c.harri...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Daniel <thomas.dan...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 4 +++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 4ec27e1..197bac1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2769,8 +2769,10 @@ void i915_gem_complete_requests_ring(struct
intel_engine_cs *ring,
if (req->complete)
continue;
- if (i915_seqno_passed(seqno, req->seqno))
+ if (i915_seqno_passed(seqno, req->seqno)) {
req->complete = true;
+ trace_i915_gem_request_complete(req);
+ }
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ring->reqlist_lock, flags);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index eb5441c..308e9da 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ static void notify_ring(struct drm_device *dev,
if (!intel_ring_initialized(ring))
return;
- trace_i915_gem_request_complete(ring);
+ trace_i915_gem_request_notify(ring);
i915_gem_complete_requests_ring(ring, false);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
index 2ade958..6058a01 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
@@ -406,6 +406,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request,
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(u32, dev)
__field(u32, ring)
+ __field(u32, uniq)
__field(u32, seqno)
),
@@ -414,11 +415,13 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request,
i915_gem_request_get_ring(req);
__entry->dev = ring->dev->primary->index;
__entry->ring = ring->id;
+ __entry->uniq = req ? req->uniq : 0;
__entry->seqno = i915_gem_request_get_seqno(req);
),
- TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, seqno=%u",
- __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->seqno)
+ TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, uniq=%u, seqno=%u",
+ __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->uniq,
+ __entry->seqno)
);
DEFINE_EVENT(i915_gem_request, i915_gem_request_add,
@@ -426,7 +429,7 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(i915_gem_request, i915_gem_request_add,
TP_ARGS(req)
);
-TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_complete,
+TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_notify,
TP_PROTO(struct intel_engine_cs *ring),
TP_ARGS(ring),
@@ -451,6 +454,11 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(i915_gem_request, i915_gem_request_retire,
TP_ARGS(req)
);
+DEFINE_EVENT(i915_gem_request, i915_gem_request_complete,
+ TP_PROTO(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req),
+ TP_ARGS(req)
+);
+
TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_wait_begin,
TP_PROTO(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req),
TP_ARGS(req),
@@ -458,6 +466,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_wait_begin,
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(u32, dev)
__field(u32, ring)
+ __field(u32, uniq)
__field(u32, seqno)
__field(bool, blocking)
),
@@ -473,14 +482,15 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_wait_begin,
i915_gem_request_get_ring(req);
__entry->dev = ring->dev->primary->index;
__entry->ring = ring->id;
+ __entry->uniq = req ? req->uniq : 0;
__entry->seqno = i915_gem_request_get_seqno(req);
__entry->blocking =
mutex_is_locked(&ring->dev->struct_mutex);
),
- TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, seqno=%u, blocking=%s",
- __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->seqno,
- __entry->blocking ? "yes (NB)" : "no")
+ TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, uniq=%u, seqno=%u, blocking=%s",
+ __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->uniq,
+ __entry->seqno, __entry->blocking ? "yes (NB)" : "no")
);
DEFINE_EVENT(i915_gem_request, i915_gem_request_wait_end,
--
1.7.9.5
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
