On Mon, 08 Dec 2014, Damien Lespiau <damien.lesp...@intel.com> wrote:
> I was playing with clang and oh surprise! a warning trigerred by
> -Wshift-overflow (gcc doesn't have this one):
>
>     WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN7_GT_MODE,
>                       GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK | GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4);
>
>     drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c:786:2: warning: signed shift 
> result
>       (0x28002000000) requires 43 bits to represent, but 'int' only has 32 
> bits
>       [-Wshift-overflow]
>         WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN7_GT_MODE,
>         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>     drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c:737:15: note: expanded from macro
>       'WA_SET_BIT_MASKED'
>         WA_REG(addr, _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(mask), (mask) & 0xffff)
>
> Turned out GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK was already shifted by 16, and we were
> trying to shift it a bit more.
>
> The other thing is that it's not the usual case of setting WA bits here, we
> need to have separate mask and value.
>
> To fix this, I've introduced a new _MASKED_FIELD() macro that takes both the
> (unshifted) mask and the desired value and the rest of the patch ripples
> through from it.
>
> This bug was introduced when reworking the WA emission in:
>
>   Commit 7225342ab501befdb64bcec76ded41f5897c0855
>   Author: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>
>   Date:   Tue Oct 7 17:21:26 2014 +0300
>
>       drm/i915: Build workaround list in ring initialization
>
> v2: Invert the order of the mask and value arguments (Daniel Vetter)
>     Rewrite _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE() and _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE() with
>     _MASKED_FIELD() (Jani Nikula)
>     Make sure we only evaluate 'a' once in _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE() (Dave Gordon)
>     Add check to ensure the value is within the mask boundaries (Chris Wilson)
>
> v3: Ensure the the value and mask are 16 bits (Dave Gordon)
>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluv...@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lesp...@intel.com>

Pushed to drm-intel-next-fixes, replacing the old version. Thanks for
the patch.

Now the question is, do we want [1] for 3.19 or 3.20?

BR,
Jani.


http://mid.gmane.org/1418060138-5004-1-git-send-email-damien.lesp...@intel.com


> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h         | 17 ++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c         |  6 +++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c |  8 ++++++--
>  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index dc03fac..454a3a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -34,8 +34,19 @@
>  #define _PORT3(port, a, b, c) ((port) == PORT_A ? (a) : \
>                              (port) == PORT_B ? (b) : (c))
>  
> -#define _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(a) (((a) << 16) | (a))
> -#define _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(a) ((a) << 16)
> +#define _MASKED_FIELD(mask, value) ({                                        
>    \
> +     if (__builtin_constant_p(mask))                                    \
> +             BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(((mask) & 0xffff0000), "Incorrect mask"); \
> +     if (__builtin_constant_p(value))                                   \
> +             BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG((value) & 0xffff0000, "Incorrect value"); \
> +     if (__builtin_constant_p(mask) && __builtin_constant_p(value))     \
> +             BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG((value) & ~(mask),                        \
> +                              "Incorrect value for mask");              \
> +     (mask) << 16 | (value); })
> +#define _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(a)        ({ typeof(a) _a = (a); 
> _MASKED_FIELD(_a, _a); })
> +#define _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(a)       (_MASKED_FIELD((a), 0))
> +
> +
>  
>  /* PCI config space */
>  
> @@ -1284,7 +1295,7 @@ enum punit_power_well {
>  #define   GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_8x8                               
> GEN6_WIZ_HASHING(0, 0)
>  #define   GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_8x4                               
> GEN6_WIZ_HASHING(0, 1)
>  #define   GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4                              
> GEN6_WIZ_HASHING(1, 0)
> -#define   GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK                              
> (GEN6_WIZ_HASHING(1, 1) << 16)
> +#define   GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK                              
> GEN6_WIZ_HASHING(1, 1)
>  #define   GEN6_TD_FOUR_ROW_DISPATCH_DISABLE          (1 << 5)
>  
>  #define GFX_MODE     0x02520
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 78911e2..0f2febd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -6389,7 +6389,7 @@ static void gen6_init_clock_gating(struct drm_device 
> *dev)
>        * to keep in mind (see 3DSTATE_PS and 3DSTATE_WM).
>        */
>       I915_WRITE(GEN6_GT_MODE,
> -                GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK | GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4);
> +                _MASKED_FIELD(GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK, GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4));
>  
>       ilk_init_lp_watermarks(dev);
>  
> @@ -6587,7 +6587,7 @@ static void haswell_init_clock_gating(struct drm_device 
> *dev)
>        * to keep in mind (see 3DSTATE_PS and 3DSTATE_WM).
>        */
>       I915_WRITE(GEN7_GT_MODE,
> -                GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK | GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4);
> +                _MASKED_FIELD(GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK, GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4));
>  
>       /* WaSwitchSolVfFArbitrationPriority:hsw */
>       I915_WRITE(GAM_ECOCHK, I915_READ(GAM_ECOCHK) | HSW_ECOCHK_ARB_PRIO_SOL);
> @@ -6684,7 +6684,7 @@ static void ivybridge_init_clock_gating(struct 
> drm_device *dev)
>        * to keep in mind (see 3DSTATE_PS and 3DSTATE_WM).
>        */
>       I915_WRITE(GEN7_GT_MODE,
> -                GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK | GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4);
> +                _MASKED_FIELD(GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK, GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4));
>  
>       snpcr = I915_READ(GEN6_MBCUNIT_SNPCR);
>       snpcr &= ~GEN6_MBC_SNPCR_MASK;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index 79b4ca5..9deb152 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -739,6 +739,9 @@ static int wa_add(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  #define WA_CLR_BIT_MASKED(addr, mask) \
>       WA_REG(addr, _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(mask), (mask) & 0xffff)
>  
> +#define WA_SET_FIELD_MASKED(addr, mask, value) \
> +     WA_REG(addr, _MASKED_FIELD(mask, value), mask)
> +
>  #define WA_SET_BIT(addr, mask) WA_REG(addr, I915_READ(addr) | (mask), mask)
>  #define WA_CLR_BIT(addr, mask) WA_REG(addr, I915_READ(addr) & ~(mask), mask)
>  
> @@ -783,8 +786,9 @@ static int bdw_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs 
> *ring)
>        * disable bit, which we don't touch here, but it's good
>        * to keep in mind (see 3DSTATE_PS and 3DSTATE_WM).
>        */
> -     WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN7_GT_MODE,
> -                       GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK | GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4);
> +     WA_SET_FIELD_MASKED(GEN7_GT_MODE,
> +                         GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK,
> +                         GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4);
>  
>       return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to