On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 08:43:12PM +0530, Vijay Purushothaman wrote:
> Initialize lock detect threshold and select coarse threshold for the
> case where M2 fraction division is disabled.
> 
> v2: Split the changes into multiple smaller patches based on review by
> Ville
> 
> v3: Addressed rest of the review comments. Clear out the old bits before
> we modify those bits as part of RMW
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vijay Purushothaman <vijay.a.purushotha...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h      |    1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |   13 +++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 8200e98..1a0f94e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -1046,6 +1046,7 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
>  #define _CHV_PLL_DW9_CH0             0x8024
>  #define _CHV_PLL_DW9_CH1             0x81A4
>  #define  DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_SHIFT           1 /* 3 bits */
> +#define  DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_MASK            (7 << 1)
>  #define  DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_SEL_COARSE      1 /* 1: coarse & 0 : 
> fine  */
>  #define CHV_PLL_DW9(ch) _PIPE(ch, _CHV_PLL_DW9_CH0, _CHV_PLL_DW9_CH1)
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 15904a8..a6b5786 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -6176,11 +6176,24 @@ static void chv_prepare_pll(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>               dpio_val |= (2 << DPIO_CHV_FEEDFWD_GAIN_SHIFT);
>               vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_PLL_DW3(port), dpio_val);
>  
> +             /* Program digital lock detect threshold */
> +             dpio_val = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_PLL_DW9(port));
> +             dpio_val &= ~DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_MASK;
> +             dpio_val |= (0x5 << DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_SHIFT);

Missing
 dpio_val &= ~DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_SEL_COARSE;
here.

So I think to avoid such mistakes it's best to rewrite this too as:

val = read(PLL_DW9)
val &= ~(DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_MASK | 
DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_SEL_COARSE);
val |= 0x5 << DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_SHIFT)
if (!bestm2_frac)
        val |= DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_SEL_COARSE;
write(PLL_DW9, val);

> +             vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_PLL_DW9(port), dpio_val);
> +
>       } else {
>               /* M2 fraction division disable */
>               dpio_val = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_PLL_DW3(port));
>               dpio_val &= ~DPIO_CHV_FRAC_DIV_EN;
>               vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_PLL_DW3(port), dpio_val);
> +
> +             /* Program digital lock detect threshold */
> +             dpio_val = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_PLL_DW9(port));
> +             dpio_val &= ~DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_MASK;
> +             dpio_val |= (0x5 << DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_SHIFT);
> +             dpio_val |= DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_SEL_COARSE;
> +             vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_PLL_DW9(port), dpio_val);
>       }
>  
>       /* Loop filter */
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to